Popular Articles

Battles Over Insurance Reform Afflict House Dems
"House liberals are offended that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) mocked their threats to oppose a Democratic healthcare bill, saying leaders are underestimating their frustration over a deal cut with centrist Blue Dogs," The Hill reports. "Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), co-chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, on Monday expressed outrage at the comments and said her group is being "laughed at." Woolsey is the author of a letter signed by 60 fellow House liberals vowing to vote against a deal cut with the Blue Dogs ... Woolsey said the signers of the letter plan to "remind leadership" of the group"s support for a "robust public option." "Robust" to liberals generally means similar to Medicare. Liberals are irritated leaders granted Blue Dogs" concessions that prevent the public option from using Medicare rates for reimbursement. They believe that will make care too expensive for many people" (Soraghan and Allen, 8/3).

JCR And The Joint Commission To Host Pediatric Safety Conference
Children are especially vulnerable in the hospital and they are the population at highest risk of a medication error, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Meeting their needs in this environment can be especially challenging. The Joint Commission and Joint Commission Res (JCR) "Pediatric Conference: Safe Care, Quality Care, We Care" will help health care organizations review current pediatric emergency and perioperative services as benchmarks to improve their organizational approaches. JCR is a not-for-profit affiliate of The Joint Commission.
News of the day
Chicago-Area Pediatricians Offering Unique Test To Detect Vision Problems In Children As Young As Six Months Of Age
If your child had vision problems, you"d be able to tell, wouldn"t you? Maybe not, says Barry Goldman, M.D., pediatrician at Children"s Health Center in Gurnee.
Endocrinology

Higher Education Level, Greater Disability Associated With Treatment Timing In Parkinson's Disease

Individuals who have higher levels of education and who are more impaired by Parkinson"s disease appear to require treatment for their symptoms earlier than do other patients, according to a report posted online today that will appear in the September print issue of Archives of Neurology, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. "Parkinson"s disease is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disease that leads to significant morbidity, disability and increased likelihood of institutionalization," the authors write as background information in the article. "In view of the potential for short-term and long-term drug complications, symptomatic treatment is customarily delayed in Parkinson"s disease until the severity of motor symptoms results in functional impairment. Therefore, the initiation of symptomatic treatment is considered an early indicator of disease progression in Parkinson"s disease and is used as an important benchmark in clinical trials." Sotirios A. Parashos, M.D., Ph.D., of the Struthers Parkinson"s Center, Golden Valley, Minn., and colleagues in the NET-PD Investigators group analyzed data from 413 patients with early, untreated Parkinson"s disease who participated in two double-blind trials of experimental drugs. "Site investigators used their clinical judgment to determine when participants had reached a level of dysfunction sufficient to require symptomatic therapy in any one of three areas: ambulation [walking], activities of daily living or occupational status," the authors write. After 12 months, the researchers assessed all the treatment groups to identify which patients had started taking medication for their symptoms-including levodopa or dopamine agonists, treatments that regulate the amount of the neurotransmitter dopamine. At this time, 200 of the 413 participants (48.5 percent) had started symptomatic treatment. Those who had higher levels of impairment and disability at the beginning of the study, as measured by several Parkinson"s disease scales, were more likely to progress quickly. Higher education levels were also independently associated with an earlier need for symptomatic treatment. "A possible explanation is that higher education may be associated with greater occupational demands and an increased need for symptomatic control," the authors write. "However, one might expect that occupations placing higher demands on physical abilities (usually associated with lower education levels) would be associated with a more pressing need for symptomatic control. An alternate possibility is that patients with higher education are likely to be better advocates for their health care needs and play a more active role in medical decision-making." "Emotional, psychiatric and quality of life factors at baseline played a smaller role in determining need for symptomatic treatment and did not enter the final model when baseline impairment, disability and education were taken into account," they conclude. "The impact of the patient"s education level on clinical management is an unexpected finding and merits further investigation." Arch Neurol. 2009;66[9]:(doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.159). Archives of Neurology


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):